Dr Shushu Chen discusses whether major sporting events can bring lasting social impacts and legacies to regions that host them. This blog post was produced for inclusion in the Birmingham Economic Review for 2022. The annual Birmingham Economic Review is produced by the University of Birmingham’s City-REDI and the Greater Birmingham Chambers of Commerce. It is an in-depth exploration of the economy of England’s second city and a high-quality resource for informing research, policy and investment decisions. This post is featured in Chapter 5 of the Birmingham Economic Review for 2022, on opportunities and building on the strengths of the region. Click here to read the Review. Click here to access an interactive dashboard featuring key data from the report.
The argument that major sporting events create legacies such as city regeneration and economic growth has repeatedly been used politically to justify event bids, and these types of legacies have been researched extensively. By contrast, social legacies and impacts remain relatively understudied.
However, this does not mean that social legacies are unimportant.
Let’s first look at what social legacies entail. According to the systematic review of Mair et al. (2021), event legacy research has included social elements specifically concerning ‘inclusion and diversity, ‘volunteering’, ‘social cohesion, civic pride, and social capital’, ‘business and government partnership’, ‘disaster preparedness’, ‘sport participation, infrastructure, and health’, ‘destination branding’, and ‘accessibility’.
Unlike economic and environmental legacies, which some might argue benefit only certain business sectors (e.g., tourism and trade) or certain locations within a host city (areas close to stadiums where major infrastructure tends to be focused), social legacies can, in theory, benefit all individuals and communities in a host region.
Social legacies are transboundary (in terms of ethnicity, gender, and other socio-demographic categories) and perhaps more important than ever in the aftermath of the COVID outbreak when people are actively seeking reasons and opportunities to celebrate and to socialise with family and friends.
The Birmingham Commonwealth Games
So, what kinds of social legacies have the Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games offered to Birmingham citizens and communities?
The Birmingham 2022 Commonwealth Games had five legacy missions: (1) bring people together, (2) improve health and well-being, (3) help the region to grow and succeed, (4) be a catalyst for change, and (5) put us on the global stage.
Translating those legacy missions into actual legacy programmes and activities, the pre-games legacy evaluation report produced by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport outlined that two out of the five legacy missions (1 & 2) appear to have been strongly focused on social legacies anticipating outcomes for ‘physical activity and wellbeing’, ‘community cohesion, inclusion, and pride’, ‘youth and learning’, and ‘creative and cultural participation’. And another three legacy missions (3, 4 & 5) encompassed social legacies (specifically ‘accessibility and equality’, ‘social value’, ‘skills’, ‘volunteering’, and ‘creative and cultural participation’), in addition to other different types of legacies (e.g., economic and environment legacies) that were targeted.
While the abovementioned various social-legacy-anticipations appear to be consistent with the promises of previous major sporting events and are evidence-based (to various degrees), one type in particular – sport participation legacies – deserves discussion here. This is because, although research has suggested time and time again that the hosting of major sporting events does not create sustainable positive sport and physical activity legacies, the expectation persists that the Games will generate a legacy for physical activity and wellbeing to ‘inspire and offer targeted opportunities for the people of the West Midlands to improve and sustain levels of physical activity’ (p. 26).
Watching the Games and the performance of elite athletes might inspire individuals and change their attitudes towards sport and physical activity, but it does not necessarily change behaviours – as established in our study of long-term sport participation legacies from the Beijing 2008 and London 2012 Olympics Games. When we examined the effects of other intrinsic and extrinsic factors (e.g., time, money, and sport confidence) on participation behaviour, we found the ‘Olympic impact’ to be one of the least influential factors affecting sports participation.
Our findings offer two key messages concerning policy learning: First, the results serve as a warning that the legacy promises for major sporting events such as the Commonwealth Games must be realistic. Second, there is a need for proactive planning and concrete, sustainable mechanisms – beyond hosting events and building stadiums – that support sports and physical activity participation.
This blog was written by Dr Shushu Chen, University of Birmingham.
The views expressed in this analysis post are those of the authors and not necessarily those of City-REDI / WMREDI or the University of Birmingham.